Bitcoin traders are once again staring at a chart structure that resembles the setup that preceded the market’s roughly 30% decline from late January to early February. But several order flow analysts argue that the comparison is incomplete, as the underlying spot book picture looks significantly stronger this time around.
Will the 30% Bitcoin Crash Repeat?
That debate was sparked on March 24 after analyst Exitpump (@exitpumpBTC) posted a graph comparing the current range to the previous breakdown zone. The visual similarity is hard to miss: in both cases, BTC traded within a defined consolidation before sliding to the bottom of the structure.
In the earlier episode from January 29 to February 5, that pattern gave way to a sharp -30% move to the low $60,000s. At today, Bitcoin was trading around $70,000, with the price once again near a vulnerable-looking part of the range.
Exitpump’s core argument is that the similarity in price structure masks an important difference in liquidity. “I see people comparing the current spot market to the previous series and what many are missing here is that the aggregated spot order books now have much more passive demand than in the previous series,” he wrote. “Dumping to the low $60,000s is fine and acceptable, but don’t expect a bigger downside as long as this passive demand persists.”
Related reading
That distinction is important because the chart he shared suggests that the market is not entering this setup with the same meager bid support as before the earlier flush. In his setup, the earlier series featured fewer halftime calls and more overhead questions. In contrast, the current range shows higher demand for spot books and relatively lighter pressure on the sell side, implying that even if BTC heads to the lows again, the path to a deeper trend reversal may be less straightforward.
Exitpump has also pushed back on the idea that this kind of deeper spotbook liquidity can be easily manipulated. After a user asked if spoofing is common in aggregate order book data, he replied: “deeper spot order books are not spoofing, those bids stay there for weeks or even months.” That is an important point in the context of trading. If the demand visible in the book is real and persistent rather than tactical and volatile, then the market may have a stronger absorption layer beneath the price than during the January-February period.
Related reading
Still, the short-term flow picture is not exactly bullish. In a separate note, Exitpump said order books had turned “bearish,” adding that “yesterday was better, but it looks like momentum to the upside is fading.” He also flagged positioning risk, saying the open interest RSI was near extreme and “the probability of unwinding longs has increased.”
Other market watchers pointed to the same deterioration from different angles. Maartun (@JA_Maartun) noted that the Coinbase Premium Gap had turned negative again, a sign that demand for Coinbase spot was lagging.
Zords (@ZordXBT) read was more explicitly cautious: “Funding remains positive + volume is down + Coinbase is in deep red territory. Not going to lie, price-wise the chart seems to want to continue, but order flow-wise things look like distribution.”
He then explained what needed to be improved to make the move more convincing. “Maybe a little more volume + Coinbase in the green would be good. A little lower funding will be the icing on the cake.”
At the time of writing, BTC was trading at $71,482.
Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com