The American economist Paul Krugman, who won the Nobel Prize in 2008, is of the opinion that Stablecoins have no practical use. In a blog post of 30 May entitled ‘Digital Corruption, DC takes over,’ said Krugman that “Stablecoins do not play a clear useful function”, adding:
“She [stablecoins] Can not be used to make normal purchases, and there is nothing that you can do with it that cannot be done cheaper and easier with debit cards, Venmo, Zelle, Wire Transfers, etc. “
That is why Krugman wondered why someone would not only use American dollars instead of using tokens that ‘supposedly supported by dollars’.
According to Krugman, Stablecoins do not offer one function that does not: anonymity. The anonymity associated with stablecoin deposits is a “valuable function” for unfortunate crimes, from money laundering and extortion to the purchase of illegal drugs, he wrote, adding to it:
“In other words, the only economic reason for Stablecoins is to facilitate criminal activities.”
Krugman mentions the technical versions of Stablecoin emission of Antebellum Banks’
In 1861 the American federal government printed paper currency for the first time to finance the civil war. For this, gold and silver were the only official forms of money.
Before the federal government started printing paper currency, various private and non -regulated banks, called Antebellum Banks, gave their own paper banknotes to illuminate daily transactions. Users can exchange this Antebellum Bank notes at any time for gold or silver. According to Krugman, however, most of these pre -war banks were ‘Wildcat banks’ that were set up with a sole goal to cheat users, which led to devastating bank runs in the 1930s.
According to Krugman, Stablecoins are the modern version of Antebellum notes, with the only difference that these currencies served a goal: to play the role of currency emensitors in the absence of federal banknotes. That is why Krugman Stablecoin is comparing emissioners with the pre -war banks of the 19th century. He wrote:
“So, just like Antebellum Bank -notes, who were published private -currencies that were supported by the claim that they were supported by gold and silver, Stablecoins private published tokens are supported by the statement that they are supported by dollars.”
He further wrote that, just as the financial crisis of 2008 was activated by ‘Shadow Banks’ that ‘precautionary regulation’, Stablecoins ‘are a new kind of shadow bank’.
Krugman says that Genius Act financiers have an established interest
Krugman was of the opinion that legislators who support the American Stablecoin Bill, called the brilliant law, have an established interest in accepting the legislation. According to him, some of these legislators are “probably” aware of how Stablecoins can facilitate crime. However, he added:
“… it’s hard to let someone understand something when their campaign contributions and in some cases their personal wealth depends on the fact that they don’t understand.”
Stablecoin -Emitents have repeatedly tried to ensure users that their tokens are largely supported by American Treasury accounts. Krugman, however, explained that practice is a considerable risk for the US economy.
This is because, just like a bankrun, if there is a stream of users who at the same time tries to exchange their stablecoins for US dollars, forcing the emennin in a “fire sale” of Treasury accounts. This in turn would increase interest rates and become a “run on government debt”, which threatens the financial stability of the entire economy. He noticed:
“The fundamental point is that the growth and identification of Stablecoins yields new risks for overall financial stability – all in the name of making criminals easier to do their business.”
He concluded that the consideration of the brilliant law indicates that Washington, DC, has become in a city that “if not fully controlled by the digital crowd, has at least largely been purchased and paid.”
Co-founder of Munt Statistics calls Krugman ‘incorrectly informed’
Nic Carter, co-founder of Blockchain Data aggregator Coin Metrics and General Partner at Castle Island Ventures, a crypto and blockchain-oriented risk capital company, believes that Krugman’s vision of stablecoins is wrong. In a message on X on Sunday he wrote:
“For a” noble “winning economist he [Krugman] has been remarkably wrongly informed about the subject. “
Carter noticed that the more than 100 million people who use Stablecoins “would beg to differ from Krugman’s claim that Stablecoins are of no use.
Carter was not alone in criticizing the claims of Krugman. In response to Carter’s post, Paul “Teddy” Fusaro, president of crypto asset manager Bitwise Asset Management, noticed that mentioning Krugman “is” remarkably wrongly informed “” Remarkable generous “of Carter’s Kant.