- Buterin spoke about the Ethereum Foundation’s spending amid the market decline and ETH’s decline.
- Critics question EF’s financial transparency and its spending categories as ‘new institutions’.
Like ether [ETH] struggling to approach the $3,000 mark, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin took to social media to express his concerns about the Ethereum Foundation’s (EF) spending practices.
This clarification comes amid a broader market decline, with ETH experiencing a notable 8% decline over the past 24 hours, outpacing Bitcoin’s declines. [BTC] and Solana [SOL].
Amid a growing debate over the allocation of resources to the EF, the foundation previewed its 2022-2023 financial report in an X (formerly Twitter) wire and provided insight into internal and external expenditure.
Source: Josh Stark/X
Details of the Ethereum Foundation’s expenditures
The message here indicated that the Ethereum Foundation (EF) spending distribution was divided into internal and external categories.
Internal expenditure, which amounted to 38%, related to the part of the budget allocated to EF’s own researchers and development teams.
Furthermore, external expenses, which amounted to 62%, included grants and payments to external teams and partners working on ETH-related projects.
In both years mentioned, expenditure was therefore approximately 38% on internal resources and 62% on external initiatives.
This meant that the EF invested a larger part of its budget in external projects than in its own internal activities.
Providing further detailsnoted the thread,
“The biggest new category in the charts I shared above is ‘New Settings’.”
This category reflected the EF’s efforts to promote and support emerging organizations that can contribute to and improve the Ethereum ecosystem over time.
Source: Josh Stark/X
Buterin joins the thread
In response, Buterin joined the discussion and emphasized:
“The “new institutions” category basically means @NomicFoundation, @TheDRC_, @l2beat, @0xPARC etc – no World Economic Forum insect protein research here!”
For context, it is the ambiguity around spending categories like “new institutions” that has led to skepticism about the Ethereum Foundation’s financial transparency and alignment with its mission of decentralization and innovation.
Critics argued that the EF’s financial reports lacked clarity and detail, raising concerns about the efficiency and effectiveness of the allocation of funds to the ETH ecosystem.
The community seems dissatisfied
Despite efforts to provide transparency and clarify the situation, community concerns persist, as highlighted by X-user Evans6,
“I don’t think many people really care about EF’s spending (it’s mostly about trolls). I think people just want consistent transparency on money transfers/sales so that payments wrongly attributed to EF can be declined.”
Adding to the discussion, another X user took a sarcastic tone towards Buterin, claiming:
Source: Dark Crypto Larp/X
With the upcoming financial report yet to be released, the impact on the ongoing debate over decentralization and innovation remains uncertain.
However, it undoubtedly promises greater transparency in the Ethereum Foundation’s resource allocation and invites the community to closely examine how these efforts align with ETH’s mission.
