In the ancient Greek story of Oedipus, great rewards awaited travelers who were able to resolve difficult riddles, but a powerful Sphinx posed the riddles and devoured those they did not solve. Likewise, Blockchain technology was in old Cryptomot Times in 2017 to bring about a revolution in finances and other areas. But two challenges stood in the way of this technology that enjoys its full potential: (1) securities laws that are not easily mapped out on decentralized systems, and (2) a securities controller that is hostile to digital assets, which often formed serious risks for those who tried to resolve the first challenge.
Nowadays the Sphinx is decided to be more useful, but the riddles continue to exist. The Crypto Task Force of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has stated that the previous regime of the agency “has created an environment that is hostile to innovation” and has committed itself to working together with participants in industry to make sensible regulations. Although promising, there remain important challenges. American securities laws are a mix of articles of association adopted by the congress and rules adopted by the SEC. The Task Force has indicated the willingness of the SEC to make the last more workable due to new rules and exemptions. However, the articles of association present most challenges and only the congress, not the SEC, can change.
Below is an introduction about the more usual riddles that are currently confronted with developers of Tokenized effects.
Legal considerations
For Tokenized effects, the developer on-chain creates tokens, each representing part of equity in a company or other security, or another active that offers the right to cash flows. This tokenization can open possibilities – such as immediate regulation, fractionalization of the shares and daily dividend payments – that make the product more efficient or functionally more diverse than its Tradfi opposite.
Although the SEC is perhaps more receptive to ideas for tokenized effects, it does not have the authority to change articles of association. Tokenized securities projects will therefore still resolve or avoid the riddles that have to solve these articles of association.
The Investment Company Act
If a token gives his holder economic exposure to assets that the developer has combined, that token project could be an investment company that is covered by the Investment Company Act, which regulates companies, such as investment funds that can expand investments and investors to those investments by shares they spend.
This mystery existed well before Crypto, and the most chose to navigate it by preventing them from being classified as an investment company. That is because the requirements of the Investment Company Act do not work well with business models that mean more than buying and selling effects. There are considerable restrictions on debts and equity increases, borrowing and even matters with affiliated companies. For those who cannot prevent these requirements from being activated, there are exemptions that may be available.
Broker dealers under the Securities Exchange Act
Anyone who buys and sells effects for others or is ready to buy and sell effects for his own account can be a broker or dealer. There is no clear line rule to qualify as a broker dealer, but consider the SEC and the courts as an indication of whether you provide liquidity, charges a fee with regard to the trading price, find active investors or play a role in keeping customer funds or effects.
Although there is currently no practical way to exchange digital assets as a broker dealer, the SEC could use its existing authority to map a realistic path. In the best case, that will take time and still come up with some compliance obligations.
Exchanges under the Securities Exchange Act
Although it may not look like a traditional stock exchange, a platform that uses smart contracts to bring together orders for tokenized effects from multiple buyers and multiple sellers for matching and execution as one, depending on the structure.
Currently, only broker dealers can exchange at trade fairs and exchanges cannot keep customer accounts or custody customers effects. Even if the SEC can rework these rules, some requirements would undoubtedly continue to exist.
Security -based Swaps under the Securities Exchange Act
If a tokenized security gives its holder exposure to the economic performance of one or more effects, they may have crossed to the complicated world of safety -based swaps. In general, tokens provided for in the exchange of future payments based on the value of a security (or events with regard to that security) without disputing ownership rights will probably be swaps. Safety -based swaps are under the joint Jurisdiction of the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The requirements for them are a lot, with the most striking rules that prohibit retail investors from buying swaps.
AML and KYC
Companies involved in the actions or transfer of tokenized effects must also take into account the applicability of anti-money laundering practices and knowledge of the knowledge. Completion requirements depend on the role that is played in the transactions, but can include collecting and verifying the name, date of birth and the address of customers.
The riddles must be worked on, not nearby
Solving these riddles is not a goal in itself. When designing a tokenized securities project, developers make choices based on the economy, technology and the regulatory framework. These areas are intertwined because the technology can make the economy possible and decide where a project falls within the regulatory framework. But because these considerations are so related, developers must analyze them holistically from the start. Regular considerations for the end can be in a game of Jenga where problematic parts are only removed to overthrow the benefits of and objectives for the economy and technology. The riddles that have been set today are not only obstacles to the many benefits of blockchain technology, but crucial parts of the answer.
The opinions in this article are that of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Skadden or her customers.
