In an era where digital innovation intersects with democratic processes, Rarimo’s latest development – the “Freedom Tool” – aims to shake up the landscape of electoral systems.
Rarimo introduced a digital identity protocol designed to revolutionize the way we think about voting and personal privacy. This zero-knowledge voting platform enables the creation of secure, tamper-proof voting systems where individuals can freely express their opinions without worrying about invasion of privacy or authoritative repercussions.
Unlike traditional voting mechanisms, the Freedom Tool uses blockchain technology and identity management to ensure that every vote is anonymous and verifiable.
Rarimo co-founder Lasha Antadze spoke to crypto.news about the origins of the Freedom Tool, how it combats election fraud, and the importance of upholding democracy and personal freedom.
The Freedom Tool appears to be a groundbreaking application for anonymous elections and polls. How did the idea come about and what motivated the Rarimo community to develop this solution?
Antadze: Identity is critical to the vast majority of online interactions, but web3 lacked an identity layer, so we wanted to provide that. However, we also wanted to embed privacy in this layer. Identity cannot function without it, and ZKPs have allowed us to overcome the identity limitations of blockchain – especially that everything in the chain is visible to everyone. Voting is a good example of where you need to prove your identity but maintain your privacy, but it’s just one of many such use cases.
With over 64 elections worldwide in 2024, how do you think Freedom Tool would address issues such as election fraud, voter intimidation and control over elections in different countries?
Freedom Tool enables polling and voting that is not only unsupervised, but also controlled by citizens. Communities are free to set their own election terms, defining which candidates are on the ballot and who can vote. In regions where the opposition is not allowed to operate and where minority groups are systematically excluded from their voting rights, this ability will shift power back to the people. The Freedom Tool represents a class of technology that is not designed simply as an improvement or a patch for the shortcomings of existing systems. Instead, it is conceived as a parallel solution, fundamentally aimed at safeguarding the basic human right to freedom of expression.
The first on-site implementation will take place in an Eastern European regime. Can you elaborate on the challenges of implementing the instrument in such regions and the potential impact on opposition and minority groups?
In totalitarian environments, the Instrument of Freedom ensures the survival of the opposition. In the Eastern European country where the first Freedom Tool implementation is being launched, it will provide one of the few safe avenues for dissent. This not only gives dissidents a voice, but also allows them to organize and unite. The voting and voting options can be used for everything from choosing an opposition leader to defining the central issues we should focus on. Crucially, the sentiment it reflects and the number of users it attracts will reassure dissidents that they are not alone and encourage them to keep fighting.
In what ways does the Instrument of Freedom align with Satoshi Nakamoto’s original vision of empowering individuals and decentralizing power, going beyond the financial world and embracing personal identity and freedom?
Freedom Tool is a continuation of Satoshi’s goal of putting power in the hands of the people. Blockchain’s journey began with the separation of money and state, and Freedom Tool aims to extend this principle to identity, which is just as essential to individual freedom in the modern era.
You might also like: Crypto claims to be inclusive. Not for the visually impaired, as it turns out
Can you explain the key features of Freedom Tool and how it uses blockchain technology and zero-knowledge identity management for secure and anonymous voting?
With Freedom Tool, citizens prove their eligibility by scanning their biometric passports with their phones. The data on the biometric chip in the passport is verified and after confirmation of authenticity, an anonymous voting card is issued. The citizen then uses this pass to cast his vote. Zero-knowledge cryptography is used to break any link between the voting card and the passport data, so that the two cannot be linked. If the ID and voting card cannot be linked, neither can the citizen and his vote.
The passport data never leaves the mobile device used for scanning. This means that the data never passes through a server and there are no points where it can be intercepted. In addition to protecting citizens from surveillance, Freedom Tool uses blockchain to protect votes from manipulation. All votes are published directly on the blockchain, where they are both tamper-proof and publicly verifiable.
The election ballots run as smart contracts on the blockchain, where the criteria around who can vote and on what subject can be defined in advance. The ballots can be submitted by anyone on a network, but require a support threshold to become active. A more detailed technical description can be found in our whitepaper.
The integration of the Instrument of Freedom into an Eastern European regime implies direct involvement in political processes. How does the Rarimo community deal with potential challenges or opposition from governments in implementing such tools?
A ‘freedom tool’ is a piece of technology with an open source basis, allowing anyone around the world to use and adapt it for a variety of purposes, from political to commercial. There is no mechanism by which the contributors or others in the ecosystem can control or stop its evolution.
The incentives for implementation at the grassroots level are driven by the actors who discover the tool and, ideally, align with the original vision behind its creation. It is crucial to understand that the developers of this tool are not pursuing any political agenda with their technological contributions. Their core beliefs center on individual empowerment and the belief in freedom of expression.
RariMe, the MetaMask Snap introduced by Rarimo, focuses on digital identity management. How does this integration align with Rarimo’s broader vision of a decentralized and privacy-oriented internet?
The macro vision is to ensure that users have control over their digital identity. Freedom Tool is just one of many identity solutions built with Rarimo that puts privacy and identity ownership back in the hands of the individual.
The MetaMask Snap is another one. It integrates a self-sovereign identity into the broader web3 ecosystem, allowing users to store their own credentials and maintain control over how they are used, as well as generating ZKPs for them on demand. This is in stark contrast to the current Web2 identity model, which forces us to rely on centralized identity providers.
Given the rapidly evolving landscape of blockchain technology and digital identity, what future developments or improvements does Rarimo have in the pipeline to further revolutionize the space?
The core innovation at the heart of Freedom Tool was ZKPs for biometric passports. This introduces a layer of privacy to one of the most universal forms of identity: passports.
Voting is just one of the many cases where you want to prove your age or citizenship and know that there is no chance of your personal information being accessed or leaked. There are a number of use cases for this technology that the Rarimo community plans to build out.
More broadly, Rarimo is a layer for universal access and verification of digital identities. The protocol provides a structured method for third-party apps to connect and verify information from a range of publishers. We plan to continue to bring interoperability to the decentralized identity space, allowing users to seamlessly transfer their identities across the web3.
The Rarimo ecosystem is based on the principles of self-sovereignty and self-managed identities, using blockchain, Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs), zero-knowledge technology and various decentralized identity standards to ensure users have control over their online presence.
Its development is very horizontal and collaborative. This approach personally excites me because I see innovative, non-defi related applications coming from combining decentralized identity with blockchain technology.
Read more: Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN): where digital meets reality
