The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has stepped up its regulatory oversight of Web3 gaming. In a June 5 lawsuit filed against Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, it identified three individual gaming and metaverse tokens it believes to be securities. Axie Infinity (AXS), The Sandbox Game (SAND), and Decentraland (MANA) were among the tokens mentioned.
The lawsuit accuses Binance of mismanagement of client funds and misleading regulators and investors about its activities. Several major tokens were also considered potential securities, including SOL, MATIC, ADA, BNB, and BUSD.
The Web3 gaming community has reacted to these regulatory developments, prompting speculation about the implications they may have for the future of gaming.
Jonah Blake, a Web3 gaming opinion leader and a family physician at Game Fund Partners, expressed his thoughts on the SEC’s proposed classification of the three tokens in a tweet (shown below). According to Blake, the tokens in question consist of “two metaverse tokens and one game token”. However, he noted that the SEC “doesn’t seem to discern the difference.” The two metaverse tokens he was referring to are Decentraland (MANA) and The Sandbox (SAND), which are recognized as leading metaverse platforms within the Web3 ecosystem.
They are likely to encounter many more. There are just the biggest players web3 gaming has had in recent years from a metavers token perspective.
— Brycent 🚀 (@brycent_) June 5, 2023
Brycenta popular Web3 gamer and community leader, responded to Blake’s tweet, indicating that this is likely just the beginning, suggesting that more tokens in the Web3 gaming space may face similar regulatory scrutiny.
“They will probably encounter many more. There are just the biggest players that Web3 gaming has had in recent years from a metavers token perspective.
In an interview with nft now, Blake says he can still see Web3 gaming growing without crypto tokens as tradable NFTs have a variety of offerings. He cited EA and Nike’s recent announcement as an example of this.
“Large companies like EA and Nike are still moving forward in digital assets, both operating as publicly traded companies. I don’t know how the US will regulate gaming crypto tokens, but the world has already opened Pandora’s box. It’s hard to shut it down when other countries support it. I am in favor of proper game token regulation that protects players and holders. I don’t know what that looks like yet.”
Brycent echoed a similar sentiment about the uncertain fate of other tokens.
“No one knows how the SEC will operate, but it will certainly stifle the growth of token models in the US until there is more clarity on what is legal and what is not,” Brycent said in a statement to nft now. “So the games and tokens referenced will be temporarily sewn in the United States until more remedies are created or provided.”
Awaiting clarity
The outcome of the lawsuit and the specific implications for the tokens and Binance are yet to be determined. The SEC’s intensified regulatory oversight of Web3 gaming and the goal of classifying these tokens as securities highlight the growing attention regulatory authorities are paying to the intersection of cryptocurrencies, blockchain technology, and virtual worlds. Just one day after Binance was charged, the SEC set its sights on Coinbase and announced it was suing the exchange.
While these developments could potentially lead to further crackdowns on other gaming and metaverse-related tokens, the outcome is currently unknown. These developments also reflect the broader trend of regulators around the world seeking to establish clear guidelines and oversight for the rapidly evolving crypto and gaming spaces.
