Solana is facing a market structure crisis as the vast majority of its investors are underwater.
This comes at a time when the blockchain has successfully wooed Wall Street through spot Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) and is enjoying significant market momentum.
However, the native SOL token is succumbing to a sustained sell-off, leaving it facing a 32% monthly drawdown and a broader risk environment that has pinned Bitcoin around $80,000.
As a result, the network’s developers proposed a radical change in SOL’s monetary policy, which would accelerate the transition to scarcity.
The ‘top heavy’ contraction
The pain in the SOL market is visible in the chain. With the token trading around $129, market intelligence firm Glassnode estimates that approximately 79.6% of the circulating supply is currently held at an unrealized loss.
In a November 23 tweet on
Historically, such extreme readings resolve in two ways: a period of capitulation or a prolonged period of digestion.
However, the sell-off has notably occurred despite a steady bid from traditional financial institutions.
Since their launch about a month ago, U.S. Solana ETFs have absorbed about $510 million in cumulative net inflows, with total net assets rising to nearly $719 million, according to data compiled by tracker SoSoValue.
That these funds have continued to raise capital as spot prices erode shows a massive liquidity mismatch: legacy holders and validators are offloading tokens faster than institutional products can absorb them.
Proposal SIMD-0411
Against this background, the contributors to the Solana Network have introduced a new proposal, SIMD-0411on November 21.
The SIMD-0411 proposal aims to directly address these sell-side pressures. The authors characterize the current emissions schedule as a “leaky bucket” that continually dilutes the holders.
Currently, Solana’s inflation rate is declining by 15% annually. The new parameter would double the disinflation rate to -30% per year.
While the “terminal” inflation floor remains unchanged at 1.5%, the network would reach that milestone in early 2029, about three years earlier than the previous projection of 2032.
The move is designed as a single-parameter adjustment rather than a complex mechanism change, a simplicity intended to alleviate governance issues and institutional risk departments. However, the economic consequences are significant.
According to basic modeling:
- Supply shock: The change would reduce cumulative issuance by SOL 22.3 million over the next six years. At current market prices, this removes approximately $2.9 billion in potential selling pressure.
- Terminal Supply: By the end of the six-year period, total supply would reach nearly 699.2 million SOL, compared to 721.5 million under the status quo.
Compressing the risk-free interest rate
Beyond supply and demand, the proposal aims to overhaul the incentive structure of the Solana economy.
In the traditional financial world, high risk-free interest rates (such as government bonds) discourage risk-taking. In crypto, high-stakes returns serve a similar function. With the nominal yield on staking currently hovering around 6.41%, capital is incentivized to sit passively in validation rather than enter the DeFi economy.
Under SIMD-0411, nominal strike yields would fall rapidly:
- Year 1: ~5.04%
- Year 2: ~3.48%
- Year 3: ~2.42%
By lowering the hurdle rate, the network aims to force capital out of passive deployment and into active use, such as lending, providing liquidity or trading, thereby increasing the velocity of money in the chain.
Three scenarios for valuation
The crucial question for investors is how this supply shock translates into the price. Analysts view the impact through three potential lenses:
- The bear case: Slow digestion If user demand remains the same, the drop in supply will not act as an immediate catalyst. The “relief” comes from a slower decline in selling pressure rather than an increase in purchasing numbers. In a market where four out of five currencies are underwater, this would result in a gradual stabilization rather than a V-shaped recovery.
- The basic case: Asymmetric Tightening If the network sees even modest growth in demand, the “multiplier effect” kicks in. With 3.2% less supply entering the market over six years and ETFs continuing to segregate circulating coins, the supply available for purchase at the margin is shrinking. This creates a situation where stable demand meets rigid supply, which has historically been a recipe for price increases.
- The Bull Case: The Deflationary Flip Solana burns 50% of its base transaction fees. Currently, issuance is overwhelming this problem. However, once inflation falls to 1.5% (circa 2029), periods of high network activity could fully offset issuance. In high throughput regimes and persistent spikes in DEX or derivatives volume, the network may experience actual supply stagnation or net deflation, bringing the asset’s value directly in line with usage rather than emissions calculations.
Risks
The main risk vector lies with the validators who secure the network. Reducing inflation reduces their income. However, the proposal assumes an activation delay of roughly six months, coinciding with the rollout of the ‘Alpenglow’ consensus upgrade.
Alpenglow is designed to dramatically reduce voting-related costs for validators. The economic argument is that while revenue (rewards) will fall, operating costs (voting costs) will fall at the same time, maintaining profitability for the majority of hub operators.