The following is a guest post from Rajagopal Menon, Vice President at WazirX.
The Indian crypto ecosystem finally has something to smile about after the conclusion of the G20 summit. The G20, which represents the world’s most influential economies, fully endorsed the IMF and FSB recommendations as a synthesis document.
These guidelines aim to set a clear path for the policy and regulatory framework for crypto assets and clarify key issues that many governments are concerned about. The article not only recommends against a blanket ban on crypto assets, but also highlights several key principles that will guide the regulatory approach in this rapidly evolving landscape.
Crypto’s influence on traditional monetary systems
A crucial aspect addressed in the FSB synthesis paper is the excessive volatility of capital flows caused by crypto assets. To limit this risk, the document recommends clarifying the legal status of crypto assets and ensuring that capital flow management laws fully cover them.
In addition, monitoring the impact of crypto assets on the International Monetary System has been addressed. The document emphasizes the need for unambiguous tax treatment of crypto assets to prevent evasion and ensure a fair contribution to national revenue. The Synthesis document also provides detailed recommendations for crypto assets and Global Stablecoins (GSCs) to mitigate potential risks while promoting innovation. This addresses some of the concerns of central banks and regulators about cryptocurrencies in many countries, including India.
The status of Crypto as a payment instrument
The Synthesis document distinguishes between crypto assets and traditional fiat currencies, indicating that this will avoid overlaps or sovereignty issues in monetary systems. However, in 2021-2022, many multinational organizations adopted crypto as a means of payment. Many of them still continue to accept it for goods and services.
While integrating crypto into traditional payment systems will be tedious, as the ecosystem becomes less volatile it could be considered in niche B2C/B2B companies before it becomes mainstream. Before this, the usefulness of the tokens to be used and their underlying assets must be clearly established, and sufficient liquidity must be ensured so that no stakeholder is disadvantaged. It is important to note that the core technology of cryptocurrency will impact payment systems worldwide, directly or indirectly, in the coming years.
Where India stands individually on its stance on crypto
As India’s turning point was marked by its joint approach with other countries, the country also hinted at formulating its domestic regulations in the same way.
During the G20 Leaders Summit, India’s Economic Affairs Minister said that India’s position on crypto would be well established in the coming months. He emphasized that India would base its decisions on the risk assessment framework developed by the G20. India’s G20 Presidency prioritized global crypto regulation and welcomed the recommendations of the IMF-FSB Synthesis Paper for the adoption of virtual digital assets. India is actively working on its domestic regulations, which already include anti-money laundering rules and crypto taxation.
Private players look forward to a higher frequency of dialogues between industry, consumers and regulators for a holistic approach to bring together a regulatory framework in the Goldilocks zone – effective, pragmatic and thriving. The industry expects an improved environment of innovation, support for local talent and investments in Indian Web3 projects without any local regulatory barriers.
A step forward for implementing regulations worldwide
The FSB is expected to actively promote the implementation of the recommendations contained in its joint synthesis document, in collaboration with the standard-setting bodies or SSBs. By 2025, the global ecosystem can look forward to a comprehensive review of the status of these recommendations at the jurisdictional level, after which the need for additional guidance or recommendations will be assessed within international standards.
This gives the industry hope for a high level of interaction with SSBs to jointly monitor the implications of how their standards apply to crypto assets, making necessary revisions to existing recommendations and strategies. Furthermore, the pros and cons regarding asset-backed stablecoins and their potential impact on financial market infrastructures will be closely watched, with private stablecoin issuers looking forward to taking an active role.
Most importantly, the fiat-on-ramp issue will improve significantly as there will be moves to introduce a global prudential standard for banks’ exposure to crypto assets by 2025. Stakeholders, such as domestic regulators, would expect sufficient assistance in terms of capacity. building to ensure fair implementation of all policy recommendations.
Conclusion
India’s evolving attitude towards crypto assets, transitioning from the global stage to a more regional focus, provides a fascinating case study. The country’s journey with crypto, marked by regulatory hurdles and policy shifts, has been a rollercoaster. World leaders will continue to have fruitful dialogues on the next course of action in the coming months, as policy implementations unfold under the watch of the IMF.
