China is reportedly seeking to extend the influence of its social credit system to the metaverse and other online virtual domains, raising concerns about privacy and control. Recent reports from POLITICO revealed China Mobile’s proposal to establish a digital identification system for users in these digital spaces. This step leads to discussions about the possible consequences of such a system. In addition, questions are being raised about the connection with the country’s existing social credit infrastructure.
TL;DR:
- China aims to introduce elements of the social credit system into the metaverse and online virtual spaces.
- Proposed digital IDs would store personal information and job data, raising privacy and control concerns.
- This move mirrors China’s existing social credit system and could impact metaverse norms and governance.
Is the Chinese social credit system going to ruin the Metaverse?
The proposal suggests creating a digital ID for users in the metaverse and online virtual worlds. This system includes both ‘natural characteristics’ and ‘social characteristics’. The rationale behind this idea revolves around maintaining order and security within these digital landscapes. The proposed digital IDs may include a wide variety of personal information and identifying characteristics. These include users’ occupations and other personal data. In addition, the proposal calls for the permanent storage and sharing of this data with relevant authorities.
An important example cited to highlight the benefits of this proposed system is addressing disruptive behaviors within the metaverse. The digital ID could speed up the process of identifying and punishing individuals who engage in sinister activities. This includes, for example, spreading rumors and causing chaos.
The parallels between this proposal and China’s existing social credit system is clearly visible. The country’s ongoing efforts to assess and rank citizens based on various behavioral metrics has led to the development of an enforcement mechanism. This mechanism, as reported by the Associated Press in 2019, results in the denial of airline tickets and train travel to millions of social offenders.
Observers also note that Chinese companies are actively contributing more metaverse-related proposals to the focus group. This is compared to their counterparts from the United States and Europe. This dynamic fuels concerns that China is seeking to set the standards for the metaverse’s identity protocols and governance, thus exerting lasting influence over the digital world.
As these discussions unfold, critical questions also arise about the implications of intertwining identity protocols with government agencies. The potential outcomes could reshape the landscape of virtual worlds and provoke global reflection on the degree of control societies are willing to relinquish in exchange for order and security.
