Este Artículo También Está Disponible and Español.
Arthur Hayes, the Chief Investment Officer at Maelstrom and co-founder, as well as former CEO of Bitmex, has published a new essay entitled ‘The Ugly’, in which he claims that Bitcoin could be ready for a profound withdrawal on a short term marching to unprecedented Highlights. While retaining his characteristic bone, Hayes explains two scenarios when he has to buy Bitcoin.
Buy Bitcoin if this happens
Hayes’ essay Starts by telling a sudden shift in sentiment that had overwhelmed him. By comparing financial analysis with backcountry skiing on a sleeping volcano, Hayes remembers how the mere hint of avalanche danger once forced him to stop and rary. He expresses a similar uncomfortable feeling about current monetary conditions, an intuition that he says he finally felt at the end of 2021, just before the cryptom markets collapsed from their record heights.
“Subtle movements between the balance levels of the central bank, the rate of the expansion of the bank credit, the relationship between the American 10-JR Treasury/Shares/Bitcoin prices and the insane Trump Memecoin price promotion produced a well in my stomach,” ” He writes, “he writes that these signals jointly remind him of the precarious situation of the market prior to the 2022 and 2023 decline. He clarifies that he does not believe that the wider bull cycle was completed, but he expects Bitcoin to fall Until around $ 70,000 to $ 75,000 before he becomes sharp to reach $ 250,000 by the end of the year.
Related lecture
He describes this reach as plausible, since stock markets and treasury markets appear deeply in his words in a “filthy Fiat” environment that is still struggling with the remains of inflation and rising interest rates. Hayes points out that Maelstrom, his investment company, stays net long, while at the same time increasing his interests in the Usde Stablecoins to buy back Bitcoin if the price falls below $ 75,000.
According to him, scaling back the risk in the short term enables capital that can be used later when a real market is liquidation. He identifies a correction of 30% of the current levels as a clear possibility, while he also acknowledges that the bullish momentum could continue. “If Bitcoin is traded by $ 110,000 on a strong volume with a growing perk open interest, I throw the towel in and buy the risk higher,” he writes in his second scenario.
In an attempt to decipher why a temporary withdrawal could happen, Hayes claims that large central banks – the Federal Reserve in the United States, the Volksbank of China and the Bank of Japan – or to make money or, in Some cases, downright increasing the cash prize by allowing the proceeds to rise. He believes that these shifts can suffocate speculative capital that has increased both shares and cryptocurrencies in recent months.
His discussion about the US focuses on two interchanged perspectives: that ten-year-old treasury yields can rise to a zone between 5% and 6%, and that the Federal Reserve, although hostile to the government of Donald Trump, will not hesitate for Printing reinforcement becomes essential to maintain American financial stability.
Related lecture
However, he believes that the financial system needs an intervention at some point – probably an exemption from the supplementary lever ratio (SLR) or a new wave of quantitative relaxation. He argues that the reluctance or slowness of the FED to take these steps, increases the chance of a bond market in the short term that can weigh on shares, and through correlation, Bitcoin.
His political analysis houses in the persistent enmity between Trump and Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell, as well as the willingness of the Fed to prevent a crisis during the Biden Presidential. He quotes statements from the former Fed government William Dudley and refers to the comments of Powell’s press conference that suggested that the FED could change its approach based on Trump’s policy.
Hayes describes these tensions as a background for a scenario in which Trump can eliminate a mini-financial crisis, forcing the FED hand. Under such stress, the FED would have little choice, but to prevent a broader collapse, and then monetary expansion can follow. He suggests that it would be politically appropriate for the Trump administration to allow proceeds to rise to crisis levels if it meant that the FED would be forced to turn in the large-scale money print that many in crypto circles expect.
China, Hayes notes, seemed ready to join the liquidity party with an explicit reflection program to a sudden U-turn in January, when the PBOC stopped his federal sales program and the Yuan stabilized in a stronger position. He attributes this policy change to internal political pressure or possibly strategic maneuvering for future negotiations with Trump.
Hayes also acknowledges that some readers can find the correlation between Bitcoin and traditional risk activa confusing, given the long -term argument that Bitcoin is a unique value store. Nevertheless, he points to graphs that show a rising 30 -day correlation between Bitcoin and the Nasdaq 100.
In the short term, he says, the leading cryptocurrency remains sensitive to changes in Fiat -Liquidity, even if the currency is ultimately traded on a non -correlated basis over longer time horizons. He therefore portrays Bitcoin as a leading indicator: if the bond yields peak and stock markets, Bitcoin can start his dive before technical shares follow. Hayes thinks that as soon as the authorities have renewed the monetary stimulus to suppress volatility, Bitcoin would be the first to remove and restore the soil.
He admits that predicting exact results is impossible and that every investor must play observations instead of certainties. His decision to cover himself is derived from the concept of expected value. If he believes that there is a substantial chance of a pullback of 30% versus a smaller probability that Bitcoin will remain higher before he decides to buy back with a premium of 10%, so that the exposure still provides a better risk -to -one ratio.
“Acting is not about being right or wrong,” he emphasizes, “but about the actions of observations and maximizing the expected value.” He also underlines that this protective attitude enables him to wait for the kind of dramatic liquidation movement in Altcoins that is often accompanied by a successive Bitcoin collapse, a scenario that he calls ‘Armageddon’ in the so-called ‘Shitcoin room’. In such circumstances, he wants enough funds available to collect fundamentally healthy tokens at severe depressive prices.
At the time of the press, BTC traded at $ 102,530.
Featured image made with dall.e, graph of tradingview.com
